However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, on June 13, 2018, deposited KRW 280,000 to the victim C through the Internet, which is a high-end trading car page on the Internet on June 13, 2018.

“A false statement,” but the fact did not have an intention or ability to sell the above contact pockets.

In addition, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and received 280,000 won from the new bank account (E) under the name of the defendant as the sales proceeds of the same day from the damaged person, from that time, from that time.

7. Until August 18, 198, a total of KRW 3,861,00 was delivered over 13 times as shown in Appendix 1.

The Defendant, on September 1, 2018, 2018, 2018, hereinafter “F Costaly 7250”), sought “F Costaly Roster” in the Internet Nurier’s “China” page.

The phrase “to report” and contact the victim G to send 2 copies of the F Costaget to the victim if you send the price of the goods.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have Fone Starget, and there was a need to return money to other victims of fraud, and there was no intention or ability to sell the above diskettes to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 70,000 won from the injured party on the same day to the one bank account (H) in the name of the Defendant, and then “The above account is connected with the MBC personnel team, and the additional deposit will be returned again after confirmation.

“A total of KRW 2,792,500 was remitted over 17 times by September 8, 2018 by means of “.”

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

[2018 Highest 7970] The Defendant received money from the people using the fact that the Defendant first received money when trading goods through the NAV, a second class goods site, and then delivers the goods.