If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 00:20 on May 6, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the above restaurant business of the victim by force, such as: (a) the restaurant of “E” in the name of “E” for the operation of the victim D, which is located in Pakistan-si; (b) the victim, who intends to make the victim drink with three chairs while drinking with the customer, was able to see that the victim should not be satisfed; and (c) why you want to see if you are satfed, satfing, and satching.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the respective legal statements of D and F to D and F;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;