2. Determination is an unfavorable sentencing factor, such as the following: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is divided into one another; (b) the Defendant agreed with the victim and the degree of injury of the victim is not severe; (c) the Defendant has favorable sentencing factors; (d) the Defendant has been sentenced to three suspended execution and fine due to drinking and unlicensed driving; and (e) the Defendant has been sentenced to three years of suspended execution on October 17, 2013 due to drinking driving; and (e) the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she was under suspended execution for six months; and (e) the Defendant has caused a traffic accident during drinking driving.

In addition, considering the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, as a whole, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable and inappropriate. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.