도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
The summary of the facts charged of this case is that "the defendant violated the restriction on the operation of a vehicle of a road management authority by allowing his employees to operate a vehicle of A in excess of the limit of the 2 axis, etc. on the road located at the Seoyang-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do, Seoul-do on November 13, 1993, and around December 27, 1993 on the road located at the Seoyang-gun, Ulsan-gun, Seoyang-gun, Gyeongyang-gun, Gyeongyang-gun, Gyeongyang-gun on December 27, 1993."
The prosecutor prosecuted the above charged facts by applying the joint penal provisions under Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995). As to this, the summary order of KRW 50,000 through the summary order subject to review was notified to the defendant and confirmed.
However, after the above summary order became final and conclusive, the Constitutional Court rendered a decision that Article 86 of the above Act is in violation of the Constitution against the principle of responsibility (Supreme Court Order 201Hun-Ga24 Decided December 29, 201) and thus, the above legal provision, which is a applicable provision of the facts charged, retroactively loses its effect.
Therefore, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.