except that the execution of each of the above punishments shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is a person who operates C in the business of manufacturing metal structures, etc., and Defendant B is a worker who engages in contact work employed by the above A.

On June 27, 2013, at low temperature storage around 08:00, the Defendants, at the request of the EFF, kept low temperature storage and repair works from EFF and prevented the space between the steel products and the walls from using the shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-saks.

In such cases, the business owner shall not use fire or ice, machinery, apparatus, tools, tools, etc. in places where dangerous substances are likely to cause explosion or fire, or the upper part thereof, and shall take emergency measures, such as preparation and work process for fire prevention, preparation and work process, keeping of fire extinguishing equipment, such as fire extinguishing equipment, such as fire extinguishing prevention covers, fire extinguishing extinguishing equipment, fire extinguishing prevention equipment such as light fire spread, fire extinguishing prevention equipment, work workers' fire prevention education, etc., and workers engaged in actual work have a duty of care to prevent fire by failing to perform fire work, such as melting, etc. in the vicinity of combustible materials.

Nevertheless, Defendant A did not inform Defendant B of the risk of fire due to the occurrence of gas from the inside of a building where the air circulation or ventilation is not sufficient, but did not prepare the work and work procedures, but did not have a fire extinguishing apparatus capable of extinguishing the fire at the time of a fire, and the fire extinguishing and the fire extinguishing, which occurred due to the adjoining land.