배당이의
1. Each appeal by the Defendants is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable even if Eul cited in the judgment of the court of first instance, written evidence Nos. 4, Eul Nos. 18 and 19, and witness H's testimony were taken.
Therefore, this court's reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts as to the instant case. Thus, this court's reasoning is acceptable in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. From 6th to 5th of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following circumstances, i.e., the statement Nos. 1 (U.S.) and Nos. 9 (U.S.), i. e., the evidence Nos. 1 (U.S.) and 9 (U.S.) that the evidence Nos. 6 (U.S.), i. 4, the evidence Nos. 1 and 9 (U.S.) that the evidence Nos. 9 (U.S. 1 and 9) could not be used as evidence since there were no evidence to acknowledge their authenticity,” i.e., the following circumstances, i., the evidence Nos. 6, 4, the witness H’s testimony, and the entire purport of the oral argument, i.e., the evidence No. 1 and the evidence No. 9 (U.S. 1 and 9) that the Defendants submitted from the end of July 2015 to January 1, 2019).