However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 02:50 on June 21, 2016, the Defendant received the report of 112 from the Defendant at the time of taxi riding in front of the C Pharmacy located in the Gu and America, and received the report of 112 from the Defendant, and sent to the said site, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant from preparing a written statement by doing any act, such as checking the Defendant’s personal information, and failing to return home after having verified the Defendant’s identity, and failing to prepare a written statement by engaging in any act, such as: D in which a written statement of damage is drawn up and taking a bath on the back of the D and policeman F, and interfering with G’s body at one time.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police suspect interrogation protocol of H;

1. Each police statement made to F and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the I;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. One month to five years from the date of imprisonment with prison labor for a prison labor in law; and

2. Application of the sentencing criteria [Determination of the type of the obstruction of the performance of official duties] Category I (Compulsory Obstruction of the Performance of Official Duties) (Scope of Recommendation Punishment] Imprisonment with prison labor for six months from June to April (Basic Area).

3. The circumstances that deny a crime in the initial stage of the investigation are elements of sentencing unfavorable to the Defendant, such as where the police officers dispatched after being reported as a taxi engineer or a trial secretary, appear to have a threat to the police officer.

However, the extent of the assault is relatively weak, the mistake is recognized, and there is a history of fines and the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor several times due to drinking driving and driving without a license, but the fact that there is no criminal record for the same kind of crime shall be considered as a factor of sentencing favorable to the defendant and sentenced as the disposition.