A. The Defendant, misunderstanding of facts, was in a state that he did not seem to have seen after the surgery.

While snow occurs in a multi-face, it is possible for the victim E, who is an employee of the waterway, to have her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged on the grounds of the statement of the victim without credibility, etc., thereby misleading the facts and adversely affecting the judgment.

B. In light of the fact that the criminal defendant committed the instant crime in a contingent manner under the influence of alcohol after being treated due to depressions, proof of alcohol, etc., and that the minimum cost of living is imposed while engaging in daily work, etc., the sentence of the lower court that sentenced a fine of KRW 3 million is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s duly admitted and investigated evidence regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, namely, the victim E, from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court, i.e., from the investigation agency to the court of the lower court, 20 minutes of 10 minutes away to his house, and the Defendant went to the open door.

In order for the principal to bring the juice from the kitchen and to clean the table, his body was accommodated in the body of the defendant, and the defendant returned back again, and her hand was placed in the knife after the knife, and her knife and knife the knife.

In his hand, the Defendant was pushed the Defendant’s shoulder, was frightened, and the Defendant was frightened, and the Defendant said, “I want to die, I want to do so,” and the Defendant reported to the police.

"......" The statements are consistent, specific, and especially false, and the fact that the statements cannot be found, and the fact that the Multilater F is also the investigative agency and the investigative agency.