2. Although the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that there was no serious result such as injury, etc. due to the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant suffered from spine disorder, etc., part of the circumstances favorable to the defendant are recognized, the defendant not only has the record of having been sentenced to imprisonment and a suspended execution several times for the same crime, but also has committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period for the same kind of crime, and the above favorable circumstances are already reflected in the court below, and the above favorable circumstances are deemed to have already been reflected in the court below, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., are considered to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the judgment of the court below ex officio shall be dismissed as “ August 3, 2013.” (Article 25(1) as “ March 8, 2013.” (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure; Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure shall be corrected as adding “the choice of a punishment and