2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

On February 6, 2014, the Defendant runs as if the victim E could normally build a house at “D cafeteria” located in the north-gu, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, 120,000,000 won.

First of all, 60,000 won was changed as down payment.

However, at the time of fact, the defendant was only experienced in the interior construction, but there was little experience in the construction of housing, and there was no ability to perform the construction work properly, and there was a credit material price to be paid at the other construction site, and it was thought to change it into the down payment, and even if he received the down payment from the damaged person, he did not have the intention

Around February 7, 2014, the Defendant deceiving the victim as above and transferred KRW 60,00 to the Daegu Bank Account (H) in the name of the Defendant’s seat around February 7, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the statement protocol to E;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (such as the fact that an agreement is made with the victim, that part of the defendant was carried out, that there was no criminal record for the defendant, and that the defendant acknowledges his mistake);