소유권이전등기등
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. As to the Plaintiff’s assertion of purchase, the Plaintiff purchased 2,500 square meters from D on October 23, 1973 by the deceased deceased Eul-do E-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and the purchase of the land included the instant land, but the copy of the register is premised on the fact that the instant land belongs to the instant river owned by the Defendant, the Plaintiff seeks implementation of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer on the instant land by the said sale to the Defendant.
However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the land of this case is included in the land that the network C purchased as the plaintiff's assertion. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion based on this premise is without a need for further review.
2. As to the claim for the completion of the statute of limitations for the acquisition of possession, the Plaintiff seeks implementation of the procedure for the registration of transfer of ownership to the Defendant on the premise that the statute of limitations for the acquisition of possession has
However, administrative property has lost its function and is not provided for its original purpose.
Even if there is no miscellaneous property subject to the acquisition by prescription, as long as the land is not disused by the relevant laws and regulations, it does not naturally become miscellaneous property subject to the acquisition by prescription.
Since there is no evidence to prove that there was an expression of intention to discontinue the public use or that there was an expression of intention to discontinue the public use, the plaintiff's assertion based on this premise is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.