Plaintiff

A and E are students organized in the fourth and second half of the D Elementary School (hereinafter referred to as “instant school”) in 2018, and the Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A.

On July 26, 2018, the Defendant held the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter referred to as the “Autonomous Committee”), and on July 27, 2018, issued a notice of the result of the autonomous committee (hereinafter referred to as “the result notice”) with respect to the Plaintiffs, the Defendant issued a disposition to replace the class under Article 17 of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence (hereinafter referred to as the “Act on the Prevention of Violence at School”), prohibit the contact, intimidation, and retaliation against the victims and the reported or accused students, and take five-hour special education for students, and take five-hour special education for parents against the Plaintiffs B and C:

(2) In addition to the measures taken against the Plaintiffs, Plaintiff A and E, the first time of the second year of the measure taken by Plaintiff E of the aggressor student, and thereafter, Plaintiff A started to come up with the first stage of the measure and proposed that Plaintiff A was defective as soon as soon as possible, and thereafter several times thereafter, the measures taken to the effect that Plaintiff A had engaged in these actions are taken by the regional committee for the prevention of school violence under Article 17(1)7 of the Act on the Prevention of Violence Violence at School, Article 17(1)2 of the Act on the Prevention of Violence at School, Article 17(1)2 of the Act on the Prevention of Violence at School, and the countermeasures taken to the effect that Plaintiff A had contacted the victim student and the reported and accused student under Article 17(1)2 of the Act on the Prevention of School Violence at School (from July 27, 2018 to September 3, 2018).