대여금
1. As to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s 22,805,795 won and 21,957,366 won among them, the Defendant from March 14, 2016.
1. On June 21, 2016, when the Plaintiff’s judgment on the Plaintiff’s claim is pending in the lawsuit in this case, transferred the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant to the Intervenor succeeding to the lawsuit in this case, and the Defendant’s consent to withdrawal from the lawsuit in this case does not exist. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.
2. Determination as to the plaintiff's successor's claim
A. The indication of the claim: It is as shown in the reasons for the claim (However, the obligee’s “Plaintiff” as “Defendant”) and the Plaintiff’s successor’s claim against the above Defendant was transferred on June 21, 2016 by the Plaintiff’s successor.
(b) Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);