Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

From August 6, 2013, the Defendant was living in the “C Mana,” located in the “C Mana,” which was located in the “C Mana,” which was around 09:00 on August 9, 2013, and even before that, the Defendant stated the “victim E” in the written indictment for the victim D, in which the Defendant was able to drink alcohol at the said S Mana, and was receiving a claim from the said restaurant. However, it is evident that it is a simple clerical error in the “victim D” on the record.

The Defendant, who intends to enter this beverage, stated, “I shall not drink and enter this beverage,” and sent a warning to the victim on the ground that “I shall do so if I am, she shall fry so that I am fry drying, and if I am to enter, I am frying, I am frying, I am fry, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am frying, I am singing, I am sing, I am sing, I am sing, I am sing, I am, I am.” The victim interfered with the victim’s Kabter business by force for about one hour, such as “I am fry, I ambry, I am ambry, I am to walk the above fyer’s kyter

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;