If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

The defendant is the chairperson of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E Co., Ltd.

Any person who intends to conduct the business of manufacturing and processing food shall report to the head of a Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over the location of his/her place of business.

No one shall sell foods containing additives which are chemical synthetic compounds, the standards and specifications of which are not publicly announced, or manufacture, import, process, use, cook, store, subdivide, transport or display such foods for sale.

No “lurine,” which is an advance-inception therapy in food, shall be detected, and yellow dust, camping door, sular leaves, and stimules, etc. shall not be used for food.

Nevertheless, without reporting food manufacturing and processing business, the Defendant made a mixture of eight raw materials, such as Mixed Power and F, which the Defendant directly imported from China, and eight raw materials, such as impulses, impulses, ginseng, etc., on August 201, 201, and manufactured 30 km equivalent to the food mixture mix “out-of-the-counter food mixture mix” in the “out-the-counter food mixture mar,” which contains chemical synthetics, without reporting food manufacturing and processing business, at the above E office on August 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of each police interrogation protocol to G, H, and I, a copy of each prosecutor's office examination protocol to G, and H, and a copy of each police statement to J and K;

1. Article 97 subparagraph 1 of the same Article, Article 37 (4), Article 94 subparagraph 1 of the Food Sanitation Act, Article 94 subparagraph 2 of the same Article, the selection of a fine for negligence, and each selection of a fine for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order does not have the same power to the defendant for the reason of sentencing, and does not seem to have been manufactured by mixing with some of the practical ingredients, but manufactures foods containing prohibited ingredients without reporting as prescribed by the Act.