건설기계(지게차)임대료
1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment, shall be revoked.
The defendant.
1. Basic facts and the grounds for the court’s reasoning concerning this part of the parties’ assertion are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The reasoning for this part of the judgment by the court is as follows, except in the following cases: (a) the 7th 5th eth 5 to 13th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth
[Supplementary account statement of KRW 110,259,00 in total amount of the tax account statement of this case with respect to the lease of this case to the plaintiff (= KRW 2,728,52,00 in total amount of KRW 110,259,00 in total amount of the tax account statement of this case (= KRW 1,006,500 in total of KRW 1,006,281,500 in total of KRW 2,178,500 in total) or KRW 2,497,000 in total of KRW 5,50,000 in total of KRW 11,50,000 in total of KRW 2,640,000 in total of KRW 1,353,564,000 in total of the tax account statement of this case and KRW 2,640,000 in total of KRW 2,640,32,630,000 in total).
85,476,00 won remaining after deducting 24,783,00 won paid from the date of payment. The plaintiff asserts that the remaining debt amount of the defendant with respect to the lease of this case reaches KRW 96,190,00 if the defendant included losses, transportation expenses, insurance premium, etc. in addition to the above KRW 85,476,00,00, but the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant's debt amount related to the lease of this case exceeds the above recognized amount, and as for the 84,491,00 won cited in the first instance judgment, as the plaintiff's claim against the plaintiff from June 14, 2017, which was 84,491,000 won as of June 14, 2017, to the extent of the defendant's remaining debt amount of the lease of this case from the date of payment to the date of 15,476,000 won per annum of the first instance judgment, each of the above 2005,841.