For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment that found the Defendant guilty on the facts charged of this case on the grounds that there was no proof of crime, and sentenced the Defendant not guilty.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, although the lower court’s reasoning was partially inappropriate, the lower court’s aforementioned conclusion is justifiable.

Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts beyond the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to general traffic obstruction and joint principal offenders.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.