However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 08:50 on January 29, 2015, the Defendant was in the taxi in front of the Gangnam-gu Station located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul without paying the taxi fee, and the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties by a police officer on the handling of the 112 reported duties by receiving 112 report and sending it to the site, as well as Doese Doese E, a police officer belonging to the Dongjak Police Station C District, which was a police officer belonging to the Dongjak-gu Seoul Police Station, which was dispatched to the scene, so that he was unclaimed on the back seat of the taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement of F, D, and E;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Considerations, such as the fact that he/she repents off, the fact that he/she has no criminal record of imprisonment without labor or heavier punishment, and the fact that he/she deposited KRW 500,000 for

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;