On February 2, 2012, the Defendant served as the head of the “D” business office that sells products for cruise travel, which is located in the fourth floor of the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Gwangju Metropolitan City.

On February 15, 2016, at around 10:00 to 11:00, the Defendant discussed G, a workplace partner of the said “D”, within the “F convenience store” located in Gwangju-dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, about H (67 years of age, south) which is the president of the said company, and examined the above H (47 years of age, F). Despite the absence of any relationship between the president of the said H and the head of the I (n), the Defendant would have a width of the president.

The president H and the head of branch office I are closely related.

“The reputation of the complainant was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police accused;

1. Each statement made by the police with respect to H, I, and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The amount of fine prescribed in the summary order of the instant case is to be imposed in light of the details and result of the instant case on the grounds of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the relationship between the Defendant and the victims, the actions of the Defendant before and after the commission of the crime, equity with similar cases, etc.

subsection (b) of this section.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.