At around 01:10 on June 14, 2015, the Defendant reported 112 to the effect that “the principal revocationist exists” during the disturbance at the front of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and then sold the F’s right back part to the police officer, a police officer belonging to the Seodaemun Police Station E Zone E Zone in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of 112 reported police officers and the handling of the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Penalty of one million won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Article 59(1) that the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime by contingency under the influence of alcohol, that the Defendant is not more than the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties, that the Defendant is the primary offender and that his mistake