A. Recognizing facts, misunderstanding of facts, and misunderstanding of legal principles, the charges of obstruction of business and damage to property are recognized. However, each of the facts charged in the 2019 order3190 cases, each of the obstruction of performance of official duties, each of the facts charged in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and each of the facts charged in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, were acquitted for the following reasons, but the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal principles, thereby misunderstanding of facts, thereby finding the guilty of each of the facts charged.

1) 원심 판시 2019고단3190 사건 중 재물손괴 및 특수폭행의 점 피고인은 맥주잔 1개를 바닥에 던져 손괴한 사실이 없고, 피해자 E을 향해 맥주잔 1개를 집어던지고 손바닥으로 피해자 E의 목과 팔을 때린 사실이 없다. 2) 원심 판시 2019고단3190 사건 및 2019고단4065 사건 중 각 공무집행방해의 점 당시 경찰관들은 무리하게 피고인의 신체를 제압한 다음 피고인의 양팔을 뒤로 꺽어 수갑을 채우고(원심 판시 2019고단3190 사건 중 공무집행방해의 점, 원심 판시 2019고단4065 사건 중 2019. 10. 12.자 공무집행방해의 점), 여기에 더하여 피고인의 양팔을 뒤로 꺽어 채운 수갑을 화장실에서 풀어주지도 않고 직접 피고인의 지퍼를 내려주려고 하는(원심 판시 2019고단4065 사건 중 2019. 10. 24.자 공무집행방해의 점) 등으로 공무집행을 위법하게 하였고, 피고인은 이에 대항하여 소극적인 저항행위를 하였을 뿐이다.

3) Of the instant cases, the Defendant did not file a false report on the violation of each of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act among those of the 2019 Highest 4065 cases, but did not have expressed his or her desire to keep the offender from being sworn at the police box. B. Even if the Defendant was guilty of an unreasonable sentencing judgment, the lower court’s punishment (one year and four months of imprisonment and 600,000 won of fine) is too

2. Determination

A. In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal doctrine, the Defendant.