2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant committed the crime of this case when he was at the trial, and was against the defendant's reputation by pointing out false facts through the information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim. In light of the circumstances that the investigation agency and the court below consistently denied the crime of this case, even though the relevant evidence is obvious, it is necessary to punish the victim because the nature of the crime is not good, the victim's failure to agree with the victim, and the defendant was sentenced to a fine of 300,000 won on June 15, 201 due to the crime of violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (Defamation) at the Gwangju District Court of Gwangju, as well as the crime of this case, the crime of this case was committed, and the court below sentenced the defendant to a proper punishment by taking into account all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant was openly detrimental to the reputation of the victim through the "D emergency car page" page after the sentence of the court below, and there is no change in circumstances and circumstances, motive, motive, motive and motive of the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.