2. Although the nature of the crime of this case is inferior to the nature of the crime of this case, the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, sold all animal residues which were reclaimed, did not have the same record of crime, and the sentence against the defendant seems to have been determined by fully considering the various circumstances mentioned above. The court below's decision against the defendant seems to have been determined by taking into account the facts that there are no changes in circumstances that may vary between the court below and the punishment at the time of the trial, and other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, criminal record, circumstances after the crime, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., are considered to be conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments and the records of this case. Thus, the prosecutor's assertion is without merit

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.