On October 18, 2012, at around 10:00, the Defendant: (a) placed a steel fence installed at the fence of the C Company in front of the C Company, which was located in the fence of the C Company, in order to take a street tree in front of the C Company, thereby damaging metal fences owned by C Company.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion asserted that although the defendant was placed on the fence of the iron, he did not cause any damage to the fence of the iron.

3. In light of the above, although there is a police statement, a written complaint, a photographic material, and a written estimate of damage against E as shown in the facts charged, each of the above evidence alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the possibility of use of the iron fence has been damaged to the extent that it would be infringed, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise. Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the facts charged in this case shall be acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment shall be announced in accordance with