When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 14:47 on December 27, 2013, the Defendant stated that “the Defendant went to a prison due to collapse, and did not go to a prison due to collapse,” and requested the victim to go to the above office, but did not go to the above office until 15:35 on the same day.”

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with the demand of the victim to leave.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement (the purport that he/she has entered the victim's office on the date and time);

1. The application of the witness F’s legal statement [the defendant and the defense counsel asserted that they did not receive the request from the victim, but according to the witness F’s statement, it is acknowledged that the defendant was requested to leave at that time, and the above assertion is not accepted] to the law

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;