Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is an unqualified person.

Victim C and Assistant Inspector D are police officers serving in the police box of the Si/Eup/Myeon Police Station.

On March 6, 2018, the Defendant rejected the payment of taxi charges and voluntarily posted it to the E box, along with a taxi engineer, on the ground that the Defendant was taking a horse at a police box of regular Eup F in F at the time of regular Eup on March 6, 2018, which was operated by the other G outside of the instant case, but was a large amount of taxi charges.

At this time, the Defendant, after hearing the explanation of the situation from the Defendant, such as the victim slope D, etc. who was on duty in the police box, was paid the taxi fee to the Defendant, reported the taxi fee to the office of regular Eup and received the determination of whether or not there is an unfair fare, and then he was frightly handled the work. The Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant, at the outside G and Dong police officers, etc. of the instant case, he was frighted to bitch C, and bitD, “I am bit bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch

The offense of insult was punished as the offense of insult, C. C. C. F. was killed

D. The victims were openly insulting by repeating the abusive language, “OK,” etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the victims who are police officers advocate the taxi drivers in the process of disputing whether or not the taxi drivers and charges are excessive, and it appears that they committed the crime of this case. The above reasons are that the defendant committed the crime of this case.

Even if the victim commits an insulting crime without due process and method, it is not permissible to commit it, and it should be criticized.

However, the defendant reflects the crime of this case, and in the future, he does not commit such crime and lives faithfully.