beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.27 2014가단149668

대행료 등

Text

1. The Defendants are jointly and severally and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 35,923,376 won and the period from July 22, 2014 to May 27, 2016.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 4-1 to 4, witness Gap and Eul's testimony, and the whole purport of the arguments.

On March 2014, the Defendants concluded an agency service contract with Busan Metropolitan City Organizing Committee (hereinafter “instant control position”), which is an incorporated organization, to determine service cost as KRW 356,00,000 (including value-added tax) for the events held by the instant control position (hereinafter “instant event”) and to jointly supply and demand the service cost of KRW 356,00,00. Defendant CNN Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant CN”) concluded a planning and overall control over the instant event, and Defendant Albnel Communications (hereinafter “Defendant Albnel”) and DNA Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant DD”) decided to take charge of overall control over the process of the instant event.

B. On March 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) proposed to professionally plan or act on behalf of Defendant Albnel the project manager of the instant event from Defendant Albnel; and (b) concluded a contract to perform duties as the manager of the instant event project (hereinafter “instant contract”). (c) verbally, the Plaintiff concluded a contract to perform duties as the manager of the instant event project (hereinafter “instant contract”).

The Plaintiff appointed A as a PM, while designating C as a business liaison book, sent C to Busan as the place of holding the instant event.

C. On May 11, 2014, the Plaintiff and Defendant Albnel and DNA have determined the implementation budget as KRW 230,00,00 (including value-added tax) as stated in the attached Table 1, among the lower patrolmen on April 2014 and the first patrolmen on May 11, 2014. However, the Plaintiff and the Defendants directly paid the expenses to each of the competent companies or their husbands.

On the other hand, however,