beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.11.20 2020고단5086

절도등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months.

Defendant

A shall pay 5,100,000 won to the applicant for compensation by fraud.

3.2

Reasons

The staff members of the criminal investigation room (the defendants) committed the crime committed the scam scam scam scam scam scam scams in contact with unspecified victims, misrepresenting them to the investigation agency, making the victim’s passbook connected to the financial fraud case, and let the victim withdraw cash and keep the cash in the specific places such as the scam scam, etc., which are designated by the in

The Defendants: (a) intruded into the telecom, etc. in which the victims keep cash in accordance with the direction of “D”; (b) stolen the said cash; (c) wired it to the victims of the said organization; and (d) conspired with the victims of the said organization in order to pay daily allowances to the victims of the said cash.

1. On July 8, 2020, on the part of the victim E (the 26-year-old and south-year-old) calls, thereby assuming the “F prosecutor of the Seoul District Public Prosecutor’s Office F prosecutor’s Office”, and “the suspect status was connected to financial fraud cases. In order to escape from the suspect status, he/she shall withdraw cash by receiving a loan against security through G account and undergo an investigation by the Financial Supervisory Service. However, if he/she takes money to the Financial Supervisory Service, he/she may be in violation of the Kim Young-ran Business Act, and thus, he/she would be in violation of the Financial Supervisory Service Act, and thus, the victim would withdraw KRW 10 million in cash to the Financial Supervisory Service, and have the victim keep his/her mother’s keys in custody at the Hemdong-gu H2el I and keep it at the surrounding convenience store.”

Defendant

A connects the Defendant’s ID to “the telegram,” and was transferred the two locations of the two keys and money from his name-free person via “the telegram,” and shared them with Defendant B at the scene of the crime. Defendant B received the keys from the convenience store in which the two keys were kept in accordance with the foregoing direction, and the victim received the two keys at the convenience store in which the two keys was kept in custody, and on the same day at around 18:30 of the same day, he opened the telegram as one of the two keyss.