A. misunderstanding of the legal principles: The Defendant illegally arrested a person without a warrant without being informed of the summary, etc. of the suspected crime after the naval investigation. Thus, the Defendant’s urology was examined.

The demand is also illegal.

Therefore, even though it is not possible to recognize the criminal facts in the judgment of the court below because the result of the litigant examination, etc. was illegally collected evidence, and other evidence alone, the court below found the defendant guilty.

B. Improper sentencing: The punishment of the lower judgment (an additional collection of one year and six months, and one hundred thousand won) is too heavy.

2. Determination

A. According to the records, ① the Defendant was able to run a telephone 203, 1: (a) reported by the said telephone 112 on March 16, 2017 (12, 13, 21 side of investigation records), ② the police officer called “150 permanent presence is within the room, 150, 200, and 1: (b) the police officer’s entry into the inside of 203, 203, 100, 200, 100,000, 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00,00,00.