2. Even though the circumstances are recognized, such as the confession of the Defendant to commit the instant crime and reflects his depth on his mistake, and the fact that the Defendant has no record of punishment in the Republic of Korea, this seems to have already been considered in the sentencing of the lower court.

In addition, the crime of this case takes part in the crime of Bosing criminal organization and takes part in the liability for cash withdrawal and remittance, and takes part in the crime of this case more than 10,511,530 won more than six times against the victims, and takes part in the crime of this case, and takes part in the 3,804,000 won more than six times, and takes part in the 3,804,00 won more than six times, and takes part in the 4th card in the name of another, and takes part in the crime. In light of the law and contents of the crime, the crime is very poor, the majority of the victims are victims and the amount of damage is not much high, and it is difficult to regulate the crime of Bosing because the scope of damage is not only a scambling, but also a structural aspect that does not facilitate the recovery of damage, and thus, the punishment of the same and similar cases need to be strictly punished, the defendant's age, character and behavior, the defendant's environment, motive and consequence of the crime, etc.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.