In recognition of the victim C (n, 12 years of age) as a middle student, the person subject to a request to attach an attachment order provided the victim with accommodation and stay at his/her own house with the knowledge of the victim's moving away from home and moving back to his/her mother line and inn with his/her mother line without his/her parents' learning. If the victim does not receive the request from the person subject to the request to attach an attachment order that he/she gets out of home, he/she imprised the victim with the near age of the victim, and led the victim to an resistance.

On November 22, 2014, at around 12:00, the person subject to a request to attach an attachment order: (a) had the victim, who was sitting together with the victim in the room of the person subject to a request to attach an attachment order (D apartment 207 dong 312), was able to force the victim by force; and (b) had the victim “tow the baby,” and (c) had the victim come into the victim’s clothes, and had the victim collected his hand with his/her clothes.

Therefore, even though the victim does not refuse, does not refuse, Mara, and low-income, it refers to "A," and the victim continued to catch both arms of the victim and forced the victim to take them into force.

Accordingly, the person who requested the attachment order was forced to commit an indecent act against the victim who is a child or juvenile under the age of 19, and there is a risk of recidivism.

2. Determination

A. According to the records and the facts indicated in this court, the respondent for an attachment order was convicted on April 9, 2015 in this court’s case on the violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, etc., and the specific crime case against the respondent for an attachment order [i.e., the violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse] on April 14, 2015 is pending in the appellate court.