대여금
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A Co., Ltd. shall pay KRW 233,421,371 and its interest thereon from April 27, 2012 to the date of full payment.
1. Claim against Defendant A
(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;
(b) Applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);
2. The facts as stated in the reasons for the claim against the defendant B and C do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of pleadings as to Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 12, Gap evidence 14, Gap evidence 15, Gap evidence 16, Gap evidence 17, and Gap evidence 18 (the defendant did not set the damages rate for delay at the time of entering into the loan contract of this case). However, in full view of Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 12, Gap evidence 16, and Gap evidence 17, "the rate of interest rate and damages for delay" under the loan contract of this case shall be set forth in the terms of transaction, and "the rate of damages for delay" x "the rate of damages for delay" x "the rate of damages for delay" x "the rate of damages for delay" x "the rate of damages for delay of 00 per annum 400 per annum x 90 per annum 50 per annum" as set forth in the contract of this case.
3. According to the conclusion, each of the instant claims against the Defendants against the Plaintiff is justified.