However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On August 17, 2016, at around 01:50 on August 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the bus stops in front of the C Hospital located in Changwon-si B, Changwon-si; (b) at the front of the C Hospital, the Defendant intending to marize on the road under the influence of alcohol and was removed from E in the process of the patrol box belonging to the Mapo-dong Police Station Police Station D, which called “Woo sk-kick kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb and kb kb kb kb kb kb k

As above, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties regarding crime prevention and suppression of E, a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to E statements prepared by the police;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (six to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the decision of sentence), six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution (the fact that it acknowledges and reflects the mistake of one's own faith, the fact that there is no record of the same kind of power, the fact that there is no reason for suspended execution, the fact that it does not constitute a reason for suspended execution, and the fact that one is expected not to repeat the same crime again)