2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized each of the instant crimes and against his mistake, and that there is a family member to support his wife and two children, and that there is no room for economic situation.

However, each of the crimes of this case is due to the negligence that the defendant, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.118% without a driver's license, due to the shock of the victim D driver's racing that was in the atmosphere signaled in the front of the vehicle, and accordingly, the racing motor vehicle shocked the victim Hack-up driver's driver's license in the front of the vehicle, for about 3 weeks to the victim Hack for about 2 weeks, to the victim Hack who is the passenger of the above rac vehicle, for about 2 weeks, the above math-off driver's license was damaged by each destruction of the above motor vehicle, and the issue is not easy in light of the situation of the accident and blood alcohol concentration, which caused the victims of the accident and caused the occurrence of the accident and caused the occurrence of the traffic accident, and thus, it does not seem to have been punished by the defendant's various circumstances, including the fact that the rack driver's license was not acquired.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit.