beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2016.04.21 2015가단89089

용역비

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 969,524 as well as its annual 6% from September 24, 2015 to April 7, 2016, and the following day.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

Article 4 (Period of Contract) The period of contract shall be until the expiration of the final contract of the apartment complex of an object.

Article 5 (Payment of Price) 1) B (Defendant) shall pay 20,000,000 won per day to Party A in cash in two installments as the transaction deposit for this contract. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 2551, Aug. 19, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25779, Nov. 15, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25900, Nov. 10, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25787, Nov. 10, 2000; Presidential Decree No. 25770, Feb. 1, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25870, Feb. 1, 2014>

3) Eul shall pay the cost of collecting recyclables to Gap on the 15th day of each month. Article 6 (Contents of Business and Trade Responsibilities) Section 1) B must collect and transport the whole quantity of recycleds except for clothings arising from apartment buildings.

3) A shall cooperate with the managing body of the apartment of the subject-matter in the performance of the business of disposing of recycled products by B. Article 8 (Duty of Safety and Compensation) Section 3) A shall pay the penalty equivalent to the deposit for damages and the deposit for transactions to B in the event of destruction of a contract due to the responsibility of A prior to the expiration date of each apartment complex of the subject-matter

4) Article 10 (Other Matters) Article 10 (2) A does not grant B approval from the time of expiration of the contract for an apartment complex belonging to an object, unless the contract is approved from the time of expiration of the contract.

On August 19, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a subcontract for consignment treatment of apartment recycled products (hereinafter “instant subcontract”) with the Defendant, and the main contents thereof are as follows.

Since then, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to exclude apartment complexes No. 6 of the instant subcontract object from No. 10,000 among the instant subcontract object, and the Defendant agreed to do so pursuant to the instant subcontract, to the Plaintiff on August 19, 2014.