beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.07.17 2017가단113556

용역비

Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 99,431,162 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its amount from June 23, 2017 to July 17, 2018.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the principal lawsuit

(a) A limited liability company (C) is a corporation located in the California of the United States of California, California, the State of California of the United States of America, and is holding a license for a character in which the license and animal are sought to design the license and animal (the name of the sublime D, the name of the sublime E, the name of the sublime E, the name of the character F, the responsibility for the character (the name of the character G).

(A) from January 2014, 2014, the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) contacted with C limited liability company’s domestic licensing agent company I, and became possible to obtain licenses in the category of fat and fat, and the Defendant determined to manufacture C character products to sell them through off-line stores or online stores, and the Defendant determined to sell them through off-line stores or online stores, and had the Plaintiff take charge of product planning and licensing duties.

Since then, the Plaintiff and the Defendant consulted on the selection of sets, design selection and manufacture, etc. to conclude licensing contracts.

(See Evidence No. 42). On May 27, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into an agreement on the business of “C” brand on the premise that they entered into a licensing agreement between the Defendant and the limited liability company.

(A) [No. 1 Evidence] [No. 1] The defendant's assertion that the seal imprint affixed to the business agreement is not the defendant's corporate seal imprint, and thus the business agreement has not been entered into, is without merit], the plaintiff takes charge of design and design approval, and securing a distribution network for the defendant's products in relation to

o The defendant shall pay KRW 30,000,000 at an early stage as activity expenses necessary for the plaintiff's overall activities.

o The defendant shall pay KRW 10,000,000 each 25th day from July 2014 to October 2019 as design and business-related service expenses.

(I) On July 2015, 2015, the Defendant appears to have written error in July 2014) paid 5% of the ex-factory price to the Defendant’s products sold through the Plaintiff as the Plaintiff’s share.

The defendant has the plaintiff as the chief of the defendant's headquarters.