except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 5, 2014, at around 23:15, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as a threat to drinking, and scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam, and a threat to drinking, and scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam, etc., and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The defendant shall be punished strictly in light of the following: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; and (b) the fact that the criminal defendant has been punished for violence, damage, etc. even before he/she received a report and received a 112 report on the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act;

However, the above punishment shall be imposed according to the sentencing guidelines in consideration of the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the defendant to commit the crime of this case, means and consequence, circumstances before and after the crime of this case, and other circumstances shown in the records of this case.