2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around March 27, 2016, the Defendant committed a crime on March 27, 2016, passed the B shooting distance in Seo-gu in Gwangju-si on March 27, 2016.

C In the C Company D bus, it refers to the victim E (A) who has been seated with a large number of passengers.

(20 years of age) Invoking to commit an indecent act against the victim and taking out the sexual organ generated by the victim’s side with the victim’s strawer.

In this regard, the shoulder of the above victim was dried up.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim in a bus densely concentrated with the public.

2. The Defendant committed a crime on April 12, 2016, which passed the F market in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-si around April 12, 2016.

G It refers from the G bus to the victim H (B) who was seated in the seat.

(n, 23 years old) laid down a bruth and show sexual organ in response to (n, 23 years old).

3. On June 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 22:5 on June 22, 2016, around 22:2:5, the Defendant: (b) laid down a brush to the victim J (V, 19 years old) who was seated in the bus stops in Gwangju-gu, North-gu, Gwangju; and (c) laid down the brush to the victim J (V, 19 years old).

Accordingly, the Defendant publicly committed an obscene act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (as at the fourth public trial date);

1. Some of the statements made to the accused in the police interrogation protocol against the witness E (A) and H (B);

1. Statement and statement protocol (No. 2) made by the police with respect to E (A);

1. Written Statement;

1. It is denied that the Defendant did not commit an indecent act by putting the victim E (A), as stated in the facts constituting the crime No. 1.

However, in a case where the statements of the witness, including the victim, are mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, they shall not be rejected without permission unless there is any separate evidence that is objectively deemed to lack credibility, and the statements of the witness are consistent in the main part thereof.