However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 1, 2019, at around 23:00, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported on the street B in front of the Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; and (b) expressed the victim’s desire to listen to the circumstances of the instant case to the victim of the defect that he was called “Skkkk kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb ked by the Defendant; and (c) kb kb kb kb kb k.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s 112 report processing and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders, and suffered injury to the victim D by “the salt pans and tensions on the part of the upper leuk leuk lele that requires two weeks’ medical treatment.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and F;

1. Statement of opinion;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify departments related to 112 report of the case;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;