However, each of the above cases against the defendants for two years from the date of the final conclusion of the judgment.

1. The Defendants’ joint crime Defendant A is a person engaged in bus driving service on the E 11-3 occasions owned by the Young Transportation Co., Ltd., and Defendant B is a person engaged in bus driving service on the F63 occasions owned by the Siung Transportation Co., Ltd.

Defendant

A, around 09:30 on December 30, 2017, operated the bus above 11-3 around 09:0, and had the front intersection of G go in the direction of the Siung-si hotel in the direction of the Siung-si registry, depending on the two lanes between two lanes. Defendant B driven the bus No. 63, and driven the same intersection in the same time as that of the two lanes, and proceeded in the direction of the Siung-Sung-si Hospital in the direction of the Siung-dong hospital for the elderly in the middle of the two lanes.

In that case, since the signal has been installed at the intersection, there was a duty of care to observe the signal to those engaged in driving of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendants neglected this and caused injury to the victim H, who was on board the bus above 63 times in front of the above 11-3 part of the bus as it is, due to the negligence of entering the intersection as it is in red scam, to receive an intermediate part adjacent to the right side of the bus above 63 times, such as a scam-scaming scambling, etc., which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment, injury to the victim I, such as scaming scam, tensions, etc. requiring approximately 2 weeks of treatment, injury to the victim J, such as light scam, tension, etc. requiring approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the victim J., injury to the victim K, scambling in front of the above 11-3 part of the bus, and scambling off to the victim Mcam scam, requiring treatment for approximately 6 weeks of treatment of the victim, scam scam, etc.