On April 2, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and on July 29, 201, for a violation of the Act on the Regulation of Similar Receiving Activities at the Goyang Branch of the District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Jung-gu prison on July 29, 201.

"2017 Highest 1086"

1. The victim C’s fraudulent futures option investment may not guarantee certain profits even if it is used for the futures option investment by lending money from others because of high risk, and even if the Defendant did not have any other financial ability to repay the money, even if it borrowed it, the Defendant was unaware of the victim who was aware of the inside of the president of the adjacent coffee shop around May 2012, the Defendant took the victim C as securities investment expert at around 1410 of the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D Building No. 1410, and as the president of the neighboring coffee shop, while the Defendant took the victim C as a securities investment expert at around 2012, stating that “if it is a securities investment expert, and there is no reason to view it as losses, the principal will be guaranteed, and it will be sure the profits of 12% per month.” The Defendant was aware of the victim suspected of profits by pretending the actual profits of the mother’s investment result as the result of investment.

The Defendant received KRW 418,470,000 from the injured party on July 2, 2012, as well as from that time until December 27, 2012, the Defendant received a total of KRW 418,470,000 from one bank account under the name of E, which is managed by the Defendant from the injured party, such as in the attached Table 1.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. The above facts are not sufficient to guarantee the principal and interest even if the Defendant borrowed money, and despite the absence of any other self-sufficiency, the Defendant was at the front restaurant of the Daejeon District Court located in the Seocho-gu Daejeon District Court located in the early 2012, the Defendant guaranteed the principal if he borrowed money from the victim E, while driving in his own capital with the victim E, and interest at 10% per month.