However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 17, 2016, 01:30 on July 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) during the process of hearing the report process against the persons concerned, the police officer affiliated with the police box of the racing police station, the police officer affiliated with the police box of the racing police station, and the police officer F, who was called to the site after receiving a report that there was a vision between the players; and (b) on the ground that he was prevented from taking delivery, the Defendant “I am unable to see this weather gue, and internal ones; (c)” to the above E;

C. Doz. Maz. Maz.

C. The Defendant expressed his desire to friend, d. d. d. d. f.” The left chest part of E was tightly sealed once by the Defendant’s f.m., and the chest was pushed down once by the f.m. head.

As a result, the defendant assaulted the above E, thereby hindering police officers from performing their legitimate official duties in relation to handling reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the handling of reported cases, each investigation report (field status, telephone investigation), copy of work site, public official identification card, and application of statutes governing the handling of reported cases;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution ( Various extenuating circumstances, such as the reflection of the fact, and the fact that there is no record to commit a crime for the last ten years);