If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On June 3, 2013, the defendant is a gold analysis business operator, and around June 3, 2013, the defendant will conduct an analysis so that the defendant can reduce the analysis fees and extract gold from the existing company by requesting the victim to analyze the feld feld feld feld feld feld feld feld C.

After analyzing the Alley dust by collecting it, it is necessary to return the gold generated according to the results of the analysis or the cash corresponding to the gold.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant was issued with the peldd's gad's gad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad's lad'

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim as above; (b) obtained from the victim, on June 3, 2013, and around July 7, 2013, a total amount of KRW 1,917,453, a sum of the market prices of KRW 1,917,453, and acquired it by fraud; (c) around that time, from around September 21, 2016 to around September 21, 2016, the Defendant obtained a total amount of KRW 12,787,852, and acquired it by delivery from the total of six members of the victim, such as the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of the laws and regulations governing B, D, E, F, G, and H

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.