If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On August 3, 2017, the Defendant reported 112 that “A taxi driver return to the road,” while she gets on a taxi operated by B in the vicinity of the Dongdaemun-gu Integrated Market in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and she gets on a taxi with a mid-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul.” The Defendant 12 reported that “A taxi driver return to the road.”

At around 22:05 on the same day, the Defendant reported 112 on the street in front of D in Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and sent back to F and G, a police officer belonging to the E District, who belongs to the police of the E District, the Defendant returned to F and G.

“Fman who requests the payment of taxi charges and returning to her country” means F : “I am this nais de Democratic Police?”

C. He expressed a brut “Sus.”

The Defendant continued to operate the PDA short terminal machine for business purposes in order to notify the Defendant of his non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 3's non-party 3's non-party 3's non-party 3's non-party 2

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of report and the handling of the case by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the laws and regulations on police statements made to B, G, and F

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;