1. Basic facts: (a) On April 8, 2013, the Plaintiffs concluded a lease agreement with the Defendant on the terms of KRW 5,000,000 as security deposit plus KRW 5,000,000 as security deposit (total amount of KRW 10,00,000 as security deposit), monthly rent KRW 400,00 as security deposit, and the term of lease from April 10, 201 to 60 months as security deposit (hereinafter “each building of this case”).

(2) At that time, the Defendant received the lease deposit from the Plaintiffs, and the Plaintiffs registered the business as representative “A” and “E” in each of the instant buildings, and operated restaurant business.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3, 10 evidence, Eul 1 and 5 evidence (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Termination of the instant lease agreement

A. In light of the aforementioned facts and the overall purport of the pleadings in the evidence Nos. 8, 2, and 3, the Plaintiffs paid only rent from April 8, 2013 to September 30, 2014 for the period from September 30, 2014, upon which a lease agreement was concluded, and the Defendant notified the Plaintiffs of the fact that the instant lease agreement was terminated on August 13, 2015, and the Plaintiffs received the said notification around that time.

According to the above facts, the instant lease agreement was terminated on August 13, 2015 by the Defendant’s declaration of termination.

B. Meanwhile, the Plaintiffs did not perform the duty of repair, such as leakage and repair of each building of this case which is the object leased, and thus, it was impossible for the Plaintiffs to conduct restaurant business on November 6, 2014. Accordingly, the lease contract was terminated as the lessor’s nonperformance of the duty of repair.

In addition, the plaintiffs are repair works due to water leakage around March and April 2014.