except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 17, 2012, the Defendant appealed two years and six months after having been sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Jung-gu District Court on February 17, 2012, and was sentenced to two years for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Jung-gu District Court on April 20, 2012, and is currently serving a sentence in a governmental prison.

From February 5, 2009 to October 12, 201, the Defendant was arrested and detained by the slope D belonging to the 2nd office of the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency, and was sentenced to two years and six months from February 17, 2012, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor from February 1, 2012 to the Goyang branch office of the government prosecutor's office, and was sentenced to two years and six months from February 1, 2012, and sentenced to a bribe to the police office of the government prosecutor's office, and was able to receive a bribe, by making up a false statement of the fact that he received a bribe, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor at the appellate court.

On March 16, 2012, the Defendant appeared in the Goyang-gu Office of Government Prosecutors' Office 702 at the Goyang-gu Office of the Goyang-gu Office of the Goyang-gu Office of Mangyang-si, Busan-si, and made a statement that the Defendant received a bribe with the aim of having a slopeD receive criminal punishment at the same time as having a criminal punishment, by making false information about slopingD, and by making up a false information about slopingD during the appellate trial process.

The written statement is that “The author was on the charge of purchasing philophones, which was listed on the investigation line of the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency No. 2 C around February 2009. However, on May 27, 2009, on the condition that the criminal in charge does not arrest the lower court, he remitted 10 million won to an account used by the criminal in charge through E, and on August 201, he provided the criminal in charge of early police officer with the right of 500,000 won in a bribe.” The defendant was well aware of the fact that he remitted 10,000 won to E on May 27, 2009 was irrelevant to a bribe. The defendant did not have any right of 500,000 won in a bribe to a slope around August 201.

Nevertheless, the defendant is the District Prosecutors' Office on March 16, 2012.