2. The judgment shows the attitude of the defendant to reflect his mistake by recognizing the crime, and actively cooperate in the investigation by the defendant, such as the confession of a female crime at the investigative agency, and the fact that the defendant was a snow-real name of one side of the disease is favorable to the defendant. However, each of the crimes of this case is that the defendant stealss or steals the property of many unspecified victims over several occasions, uses a private document under the name of another, forges and uses a stolen resident registration certificate, uses a stolen resident registration certificate for a long period, has been made against many victims, has not been agreed with the victims or has not been recovered from damage to the victims until the trial of the party, has a history of being punished twice for the same crime, and some crimes have been committed during the suspended execution period.

In full view of the above favorable circumstances and other circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the pleadings, even if considering all favorable circumstances for the defendant, it cannot be deemed unfair because the court below’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.