면허증불실기재
1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.
2. Defendant A shall be subject to the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
1. On January 21, 2009, Defendant A submitted an application for the re-issuance of a driver’s license to the public service center of the vice police station Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, and submitted the application with his personal information stated in the application and attaching a photograph verifying friendly B.
Around December 17 of the same year, the Defendant again submitted an application for renewal of a driver's license to the above public service center located in the Grand-dong, Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, and submitted the application to a police official who is not aware of the above facts, by entering his personal information in the application and using the evidence photograph of the above B previously submitted.
Accordingly, the above police officer who is unaware of such fact entered B's photograph in the vehicle driving license ledger of the defendant.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false report to a public official and made him enter false matters in his license.
2. Defendant B was a person who is engaged in driving a DM7 car, and Defendant B was driving a crosswalk in front of the Socyoung Elementary School located in the Dong-dong, Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si on April 25, 2014, according to the one-lanes between the lower-speed area and the lower-speed area from the lower-speed area to the front elementary school.
There is an intersection where signal lights are installed, and there is a crosswalk, so the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to see the front door for the driver of the vehicle and to prevent the accident by reducing the speed by properly examining whether there is a pedestrian in the crosswalk depending on signal, etc.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the stop signal as it is, instead of negligent negligence, received the part of the bridge of the victim E (the age of 18) who walked along the crosswalk according to the green signal of the marina.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the occupational negligence above, such as failure to keep the right to the right for about three weeks.
Summary of Evidence
1..