If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On 02:00 on 03. 03. 03. 02:00, the "C Zone B", a D driver, visited the C Zone in order that the defendant would not get off and get out of the taxi under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, the victim F, who has worked in the four teams of the C District District 4 team, expressed that the defendant "the victim f," was "the victim f," and that "the defendant f, the defendant himself, "I f, f, f, f, f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.