Around July 2012, the Plaintiff requested for the implementation of the Plaintiff’s project and purchase of land. Around July 2012, the Plaintiff implemented a natural gas supply facility project on a daily scale of B 3,325 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). Around July 201, the Defendant, who was in charge of the purchase of land as the head of the Plaintiff’s C team, was in consultation with E, the owner of the instant land

On July 25, 2012, the average price at the base market price of the instant land was KRW 997,921,000 as a result of the appraisal conducted by the Japanese Appraisal Corporation and the Sam Chang Chang Chang Appraisal Corporation.

On August 22, 2012, the Defendant sent to E a letter of “request for the conclusion of a sales contract following a consultation on acquisition of public land” with the content of requesting the conclusion of the sales contract on the instant land under the Plaintiff’s name. The said letter of public order stated “The amount of contract conclusion: the average amount assessed by not less than two appraisal institutions,” and the aggregate amount of separate documents as “769,442,500 won.”

D. On August 25, 2012, E proposed that “If the Defendant and the Defendant make efforts to receive appropriate prices for the instant land, they would be able to obtain appropriate prices, they would change the increased amount compared to the purchase price of KRW 769,442,50, which was first requested, and E received the proposal.”

D after L L, after L, endeavored with the Defendant, to increase the sales price of the instant land to KRW 997,921,00,000, the sales price of the instant land was increased to KRW 110,000,000, which is 1/2 of the difference, and E entered into a contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff to sell the instant land in KRW 997,921,000, and paid KRW 110,000 to D on August 31, 2012.

D paid the Defendant KRW 50,000,000 out of the above KRW 110,000,000.

The progress of the relevant lawsuit and E, July 26, 2013, in collusion with the Defendant and D to the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and D, the District Court Goyang-si 2013Kahap6841, the land of this case.